Well first of all, when fact checked your source comes up as "misleading". Secondly, it was actually found that it did reduce transmission. But even if it didn't it's nonsense. Just because it didn't stop people from transmitting the disease doesn't mean to say that it didn't either stop people from catching it, or reduce the symptoms/de…
Well first of all, when fact checked your source comes up as "misleading". Secondly, it was actually found that it did reduce transmission. But even if it didn't it's nonsense. Just because it didn't stop people from transmitting the disease doesn't mean to say that it didn't either stop people from catching it, or reduce the symptoms/deaths and therefore prevented hospital overcrowding and deaths.
I wouldn't dream of silencing dissenting views as long as they didn't kill people. Yours do. Some bloke from quadrant.
Incidentally, your "dissenting views" are quite safe here. Chris Trotter seems to have decided ages ago that vaccine denialism is kosher.
Well first of all, when fact checked your source comes up as "misleading". Secondly, it was actually found that it did reduce transmission. But even if it didn't it's nonsense. Just because it didn't stop people from transmitting the disease doesn't mean to say that it didn't either stop people from catching it, or reduce the symptoms/deaths and therefore prevented hospital overcrowding and deaths.
I wouldn't dream of silencing dissenting views as long as they didn't kill people. Yours do. Some bloke from quadrant.
Incidentally, your "dissenting views" are quite safe here. Chris Trotter seems to have decided ages ago that vaccine denialism is kosher.